<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bannerblog - Latest Comments in Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://bannerblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Showcasing the worlds best online advertising</description><atom:link href="https://bannerblog.disqus.com/apple_satisfaction_meter/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:27:07 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3936719</link><description>&lt;p&gt;A few years back I remember trafficking an ad to the Yahoo networks homepage "masthead east" (smaller unit with no sound)that was 400K for the day. Granted, Yahoo is going to charge more than the NYT, but 200k seems more accurate to me.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">beeferswisser</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:27:07 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3936546</link><description>&lt;p&gt;wow.  they actually included a call to action at the end of their banner.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">scott</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 13:17:41 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3919689</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Actually upwards of 200k . . . &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">tetuanrp</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:27:55 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3917834</link><description>&lt;p&gt;If this is a fixed roadblock on the homepage and lets say they get like 500K visits in one day... it would be about $20K to own those spots for the day.  That's my educated guess anyway : ) &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Carolyn</dc:creator><pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:57:22 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3898371</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I was thinking about media costs, as well, after seeing this yesterday.  I'll try my best to get a cost range, but input would be greatly appreciated:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;START: Let's make this easy and assume they ran these ads on &lt;a href="http://CNN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CNN.com"&gt;CNN.com&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://NYTimes.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="NYTimes.com"&gt;NYTimes.com&lt;/a&gt; and Wall Street Journal (&lt;a href="http://WSJ.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WSJ.com"&gt;WSJ.com&lt;/a&gt;):&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;a) &lt;a href="http://CNN.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="CNN.com"&gt;CNN.com&lt;/a&gt; daily uniques --&lt;br&gt;~5MM (Source: TechCrunch, &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5nt4jj)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/5nt4jj)"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5nt4jj)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;b) NYTimes daily uniques --&lt;br&gt;~66MM (Source: Editor &amp;amp; Publisher, &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/5kqr5o)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/5kqr5o)"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/5kqr5o)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;c) &lt;a href="http://WSJ.com" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="WSJ.com"&gt;WSJ.com&lt;/a&gt; daily uniques --&lt;br&gt;~236M (Source: Dallas Morning News, &lt;a href="http://tinyurl.com/6xnwfv)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://tinyurl.com/6xnwfv)"&gt;http://tinyurl.com/6xnwfv)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;===&lt;br&gt;TOTAL UNIQUES: 5,302,000&lt;br&gt;===&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Guessing the CPM on these sites is the tricky part.  TBWA/Chiat/Day probably has a good relationship with all three sites as they likely run ads in their offline equivalents.  Let's account for some savvy negotiations and say the CPM is in the range of $15 - 40 per site for this placement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And in this big of a buy, I'll bet that the publisher site is covering the PointRoll serving fee, but we can put this in the range of $0 - $2.50.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;LOW estimate: 5302M * $15 = $79,530 per site&lt;br&gt;HIGH estimate: 5302M * ($40 + $2.50) = $225,355 per site&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;===&lt;br&gt;LOW TOTAL COST = $238,590 USD&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;HIGH TOTAL COST = $676,065 USD&lt;br&gt;===&lt;br&gt;Conversions:&lt;br&gt;AUD range $366,892 to $1,039,620&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EUR range €188,698 to €534,692&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;GBP range £158,048 to £447,843&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;***&lt;br&gt;It'd be great to get some other input here because I've made some broad (probably inane) assumptions.  Anyone else have thoughts?&lt;br&gt;***&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Buchok</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 13:34:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Apple: Satisfaction Meter</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2008/11/apple_satisfaction_meter.php#comment-3892378</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Very over indeed. Banner isn't that fancy....and the pc guy is making fun of the Apple guy.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Michiel Ebberink</dc:creator><pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 05:19:55 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>