<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bannerblog - Latest Comments in Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://bannerblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Showcasing the worlds best online advertising</description><atom:link href="https://bannerblog.disqus.com/ford_econetic_map/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:00:14 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21595697</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Understand where they're going with this but the jury is still out for me on G-maps integration into spaces this small.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pixeltwidler</dc:creator><pubDate>Sun, 01 Nov 2009 23:00:14 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21141884</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Typing in my old postcode of SW11 shows me this ‘impressive’ map of how far I can travel (see below).  About ½ a millimeter on this map by the looks of things.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Did no-one think that they should be using ‘how far can you travel on one tank rather than one gallon?’.  It’s a bit like saying… ‘How far can you run on one breath of air…  ½ metre’.  It doesn’t sound very good.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Also… at the very least, they might have considered using a map on a larger scale to make the distance look further!!!&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;VW's drive to Geneva on one tank was a far more compelling proposition.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Melbourne78</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 19:07:54 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21107140</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hmmm... this one doesn't do it for me compared to the smart version (&lt;a href="http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/smart_maps.php)" rel="nofollow noopener" target="_blank" title="http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/smart_maps.php)"&gt;http://www.bannerblog.com.a...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Told me my postcode was invalid, doesn't make it outside the UK and lacks personality. I like how it works but the smart version just felt a lot more personalised and on-brand.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Simon Gregory</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 11:01:48 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21102171</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Nice one.&lt;br&gt;I think I still prefer this one :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Hardwidge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:20:17 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21101483</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Fixing the Smart one now&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrtruffle</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:58:10 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Ford: ECOnetic Map</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/10/ford_econetic_map.php#comment-21101353</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I couldn't get the postcode to work on the Smart version (missing API key), but I love the video at the start, and the fact that the result is in an expanded panel.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So many expandable ads these days just have repeated content in the expanded panel (when media leads instead of creative in many cases). I love to see rich media benefits used creatively and intuitively. Good show!&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Hardwidge</dc:creator><pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:54:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>