<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>Bannerblog - Latest Comments in Sony Ericsson: Hopper Invasion</title><link>http://bannerblog.disqus.com/</link><description>Showcasing the worlds best online advertising</description><atom:link href="https://bannerblog.disqus.com/sony_ericsson_hopper_invasion/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:39:29 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Sony Ericsson: Hopper Invasion</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/11/sony_ericsson_hopper_invasion.php#comment-22066303</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I chose to share this as I liked the website and then saw the banner afterwards. I also thought it was "interesting" that a big brand like Sony Erricson chose to not add their brand to the banner.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Banners we post on Bannerblog are to generate discussion, ideas or envy and not always all at once.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">mrtruffle</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 17:39:29 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony Ericsson: Hopper Invasion</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/11/sony_ericsson_hopper_invasion.php#comment-22034920</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Why did you choose to share a flash (at best Polite) ad? Because it's unbranded? Unbranded ads aren't anything new, and this one sucks. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">eaj01</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:02:57 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony Ericsson: Hopper Invasion</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/11/sony_ericsson_hopper_invasion.php#comment-22024344</link><description>&lt;p&gt;The agency is Dare Digital in London.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Ciaran O'Reilly</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:46:34 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Sony Ericsson: Hopper Invasion</title><link>http://www.bannerblog.com.au/2009/11/sony_ericsson_hopper_invasion.php#comment-22023917</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I have nothing rationally against this idea. I just don't personally like it, despite actually wanting a Satio phone. It feels a bit too "gimmicky" for me.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a brave move to rely on the font to represent the brand (especially as Rockwell and American Typewriter are a popular choice with brands). But, as a SE customer, I recognised who it was immediately.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It feels like they're trying to align themselves more closely with the Sony Bravia brand too (balls, bunnies etc).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That said, it caught my attention when I saw it live, and the Yahoo! flash mob got them some great PR too.&lt;br&gt;Maybe a bit of variation in the hopper animation would have given the execution a bit more personality.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Tom Hardwidge</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:23:12 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>